The pro-life position is often attacked and dismissed with politically charged language and cultural buzzwords that sound persuasive but collapse under scrutiny. When you pause and examine the talking points our culture repeats about abortion, the logic quickly unravels.
The truth is that most people who call themselves pro-choice have never been forced to wrestle with the implications of their position. In this article, we present ten questions that challenge the core of the pro-choice worldview and expose its contradictions. Each one is designed to confront the assumptions our culture takes for granted and to bring clarity to a debate that is too often detached from honest reflection. Most people have never been pressed to think about abortion carefully as rational, moral human beings. These questions help change that.
Arm yourself with these ten questions and step into the conversation with clarity and courage.
- Double Homicide
Why was Scott Peterson charged with double homicide for killing his pregnant wife, but if she had chosen abortion, it would have been legal?
For more info on this law: LINK
- Gendercide
Is there anything wrong with aborting a baby simply because it is the “wrong” gender, even if the child is viable and perfectly healthy? Should gender-based abortions be acceptable?
For an article about the effects of gendercide: LINK
- Unborn vs Newborn
What are the exact differences between an unborn child and a newborn that make it acceptable to kill one but not the other?
For an unbiased professional review of the subject: LINK
- Down Syndrome and Traits
Is it right to end an unborn child’s life because of traits you do not want, such as Down Syndrome? If we reject killing people after birth for their disabilities, why do we allow it before birth?
Read more: LINK
- Fetal Pain
If an unborn baby can feel pain, should anesthesia be required before an abortion?
Check out the research: LINK
- Embryonic Research
Is it ethical to create and destroy human life in order to harvest body parts or cells for research? Does that cross a moral line?
More on this subject: LINK
- Premature vs Late-Term
Why do we rush to save a 23-week-old preemie in the NICU while allowing the abortion of a 28-week-old baby in the womb? Why does the sentiment of a mother wanting or not wanting a fetus determine if it is a person?
Learn more: LINK
- Treatment of Aborted Remains
If aborted babies are just “clumps of cells,” why should it matter that an abortionist like Ulrich Klopfer kept thousands of them in his home?
More about this: LINK
- Full-Term Abortions
If a baby is a person at birth, why was it not a person three months earlier in the womb? What changed besides its environment?
See the Gallup Poll: LINK
- Racially Targeted Abortions
Should abortion be allowed if the reason is to eliminate a baby of a certain race? Why is it that Planned Parenthood is allowed to operate with a literal history of eugenic prejudice toward black Americans and other minorities?
See the investigation: LINK
Share This Post
If these questions helped sharpen your understanding, pass them on. Share this with your pastor, small group, Sunday school class, or friends who are navigating pro-life convictions. Together we can spread clarity and courage.
